Royal Canin Recovery vs. Marshall Ferret Crunch
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to ferret charities. Read our mission statement
Royal Canin has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Marshall's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Royal Canin has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods are pea-free. Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
Royal Canin Recovery
Royal Canin has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Marshall's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Royal Canin has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
First 10 ingredients:
poultry by-products chicken meat hydrolysed pork gelatin corn starch mixture powdered cellulose fish oil caseinate minerals sunflower oil psyllium husks and seeds
Marshall Ferret Crunch
First 10 ingredients:
chicken by-products chicken chicken by-product meal corn meal dried beet pulp brewers dried yeast dl-methionine l-lysine sodium propionate and mixed tocopherols taurine
Royal Canin RecoveryCanned |
Marshall Ferret CrunchKibble |
|
|
Score
C |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Canned | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 12.7% | 38% |
| Fat % | 6.4% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 2.3% | 3.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 1.98 to 1 | 2.11 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 12 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
3 total
high quality |
3 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
2 total
low concentration |
2 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | Yes | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | No |
|
Prescription needed
We only link to quality products. |
