Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula vs. Blue Wilderness Adult Chicken
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Nutrience has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Nutrience has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Nutrience has a lower concentration (14th vs 3rd ingredient).
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula
Nutrience has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Nutrience has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Both foods have peas, but Nutrience has a lower concentration (14th vs 3rd ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken deboned turkey chicken meal turkey meal salmon chicken liver chicken heart turkey liver turkey heart herring
Blue Wilderness Adult Chicken
Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken chicken meal pea protein tapioca starch peas menhaden fish meal chicken fat dried egg product pea fiber natural flavor
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley FormulaKibble |
Blue Wilderness Adult ChickenKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 42% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3.5% | 4% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2.1 to 1 | 2.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 57 | 37 |
| Meat Content |
19 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
18 total
low concentration |
13 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 14th Ingredient | No, 3rd Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
