Orijen Tundra vs. Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Chicken
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 4th ingredient).
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Catit's ratio of 2.46 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 4th ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & Chicken
Catit has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
black soldier fly larvae hydrolyzed yeast protein millet peas lentils chicken sunflower oil natural chicken flavor flaxseeds hulled sunflower seeds
Orijen TundraKibble |
Catit Nuna Insect Protein & ChickenKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 32% |
| Fat % | 20% | 13% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.46 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 16 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
2 total
low concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
4 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | No, 4th Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
