Purina Kitten Chow Naturals vs. Burgess Excel Ferret Nuggets
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Burgess has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Burgess has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Burgess has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods are pea-free.
Purina Kitten Chow Naturals
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken by-product meal corn gluten meal soy flour ground yellow corn beef fat rice ground whole wheat natural liver flavor phosphoric acid
Burgess Excel Ferret Nuggets
Burgess has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 2.67 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Burgess has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Burgess has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
poultry meal rice poultry fat fish meal hydrolysed poultry meal brewer’s yeast beet pulp poultry gravy salt short chain fructo-oligosaccharides 0.25%
Purina Kitten Chow NaturalsKibble |
Burgess Excel Ferret NuggetsKibble |
|
Score
C |
Score
C |
|
Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
Protein % | 40% | 38% |
Fat % | 15% | 20% |
Fiber % | 2.5% | 1% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 2.67 to 1 | 1.9 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 20 | 14 |
Meat Content |
4 total
high quality |
4 total
low quality |
Non-Meats |
5 total
low concentration |
2 total
low concentration |
Pea-free | Yes | Yes |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |