Orijen Regional Red vs. Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Rawz is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 26th ingredient.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Rawz is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 26th ingredient.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken broth fenugreek seeds natural flavor potassium chloride choline chloride calcium carbonate salt vegetable broth
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver PateCanned |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | 96% |
| Protein % | 40% | 11% |
| Fat % | 20% | 9% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 1% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 8 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 26th Ingredient | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
