Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders vs. Royal Canin Recovery
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to ferret charities. Read our mission statement
Royal Canin has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.48 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Smallbatch has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods are pea-free.
Smallbatch Chickenbatch Sliders
Smallbatch has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken skinless chicken backs chicken hearts chicken gizzards chicken livers salmon oil organic dandelion greens organic apple cider vinegar organic kelp organic bee pollen
Royal Canin Recovery
Royal Canin has a better protein to fat ratio. Smallbatch's ratio of 1.48 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
poultry by-products chicken meat hydrolysed pork gelatin corn starch mixture powdered cellulose fish oil caseinate minerals sunflower oil psyllium husks and seeds
Smallbatch Chickenbatch SlidersFrozen Raw |
Royal Canin RecoveryCanned |
|
|
Score
A+ |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Frozen Raw | Canned |
| Meat % | 97% | Unknown |
| Protein % | 16% | 12.7% |
| Fat % | 10.8% | 6.4% |
| Fiber % | 0.2% | 2.3% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 1.48 to 1 | 1.98 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 12 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
5 total
high concentration, high quality |
3 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
4 total
low concentration |
2 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | Yes | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
Prescription needed
We only link to quality products. |
