Blue Wilderness Kitten Chicken vs. Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Blue Wilderness has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Rawz has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Rawz is 100% pea-free; Blue Wilderness has peas as its 3rd ingredient.
Blue Wilderness Kitten Chicken
Blue Wilderness has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken chicken meal pea protein tapioca starch menhaden fish meal chicken fat peas dried egg product flaxseed natural flavor
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Rawz has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Rawz is 100% pea-free; Blue Wilderness has peas as its 3rd ingredient.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken broth fenugreek seeds natural flavor potassium chloride choline chloride calcium carbonate salt vegetable broth
Blue Wilderness Kitten ChickenKibble |
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver PateCanned |
|
Score
F |
Score
A+ |
|
Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
Meat % | Unknown | 96% |
Protein % | 40% | 11% |
Fat % | 20% | 9% |
Fiber % | 3.5% | 1% |
Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.22 to 1 |
Total Ingredients | 38 | 8 |
Meat Content |
6 total
high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
Non-Meats |
13 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
Pea-free | No, 3rd Ingredient | Yes |
Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
We only link to quality products. |