Marshall Premium Chicken Entree vs. Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Marshall has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Rawz has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Rawz is 100% pea-free; Marshall has peas as its 4th ingredient.
Marshall Premium Chicken Entree
Marshall has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 1.22 to 1 is too low (too fatty). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken broth tapioca starch pea protein salt tricalcium phosphate natural flavors guar gum fish oil sodium tripolyphosphate
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver Pate
Rawz has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Rawz has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Rawz is 100% pea-free; Marshall has peas as its 4th ingredient.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken chicken liver chicken broth fenugreek seeds natural flavor potassium chloride choline chloride calcium carbonate salt vegetable broth
Marshall Premium Chicken EntreeCanned |
Rawz Chicken & Chicken Liver PateCanned |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
A+ |
|
| Food Type | Canned | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | 96% |
| Protein % | 8% | 11% |
| Fat % | 4% | 9% |
| Fiber % | 1% | 1% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 1.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 15 | 8 |
| Meat Content |
3 total
high quality |
4 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
3 total
low concentration |
1 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 4th Ingredient | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
