Marshall Ferret Crunch vs. Purina Cat Chow Naturals
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Marshall has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 3.78 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Marshall has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Marshall has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods are pea-free. Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
Marshall Ferret Crunch
Marshall has a better protein to fat ratio. Purina's ratio of 3.78 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Marshall has fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Marshall has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken by-products chicken chicken by-product meal corn meal dried beet pulp brewers dried yeast dl-methionine l-lysine sodium propionate and mixed tocopherols taurine
Purina Cat Chow Naturals
Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken corn gluten meal brewers rice chicken by-product meal soybean meal ground yellow corn animal fat turkey powdered cellulose natural flavor
Marshall Ferret CrunchKibble |
Purina Cat Chow NaturalsKibble |
|
|
Score
C |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 38% | 34% |
| Fat % | 18% | 9% |
| Fiber % | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2.11 to 1 | 3.78 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 12 | 20 |
| Meat Content |
3 total
high quality |
4 total
low concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
2 total
low concentration |
6 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | Yes | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | No | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
