Orijen Regional Red vs. Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Nutrience's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Nutrience has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (26th vs 14th ingredient).
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Nutrience's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (26th vs 14th ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley Formula
Nutrience has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken deboned turkey chicken meal turkey meal salmon chicken liver chicken heart turkey liver turkey heart herring
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Nutrience SubZero Fraser Valley FormulaKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 42% |
| Fat % | 20% | 20% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.1 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 57 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
19 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
18 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 26th Ingredient | No, 14th Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
