Orijen Regional Red vs. Tiki Cat Napili Luau Wild Salmon & Chicken
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
If you purchase a product or service linked from this page, we may receive a commission. We will never link to or promote unhealthy or dangerous products. 100% of profits will be donated to ferret charities. Read our mission statement
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Tiki Cat's ratio of 4.29 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Tiki Cat has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are 100% free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Tiki Cat is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 26th ingredient.
Orijen Regional Red
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Tiki Cat's ratio of 4.29 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
First 10 ingredients:
deboned beef deboned wild boar deboned goat deboned lamb lamb liver beef liver beef tripe wild boar liver deboned mutton beef heart
Tiki Cat Napili Luau Wild Salmon & Chicken
Tiki Cat has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Tiki Cat is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 26th ingredient.
First 10 ingredients:
salmon chicken chicken broth sunflower seed oil calcium lactate dicalcium phosphate potassium chloride taurine choline chloride salt
Orijen Regional RedKibble |
Tiki Cat Napili Luau Wild Salmon & ChickenCanned |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Canned |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 15% |
| Fat % | 20% | 3.5% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 0% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 4.29 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 59 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
31 total
high concentration, high quality |
3 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
23 total
low concentration |
None |
| Pea-free | No, 26th Ingredient | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
