Orijen Tundra vs. Blue Wilderness Adult Chicken
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 3rd ingredient).
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Blue Wilderness's ratio of 2.22 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 3rd ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Blue Wilderness Adult Chicken
Blue Wilderness has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned chicken chicken meal pea protein tapioca starch peas menhaden fish meal chicken fat dried egg product pea fiber natural flavor
Orijen TundraKibble |
Blue Wilderness Adult ChickenKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 4% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.22 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 37 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
13 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | No, 3rd Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
