Orijen Tundra vs. Catit Recipes Oak Valley
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Catit's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Catit has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 8th ingredient).
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Catit's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 8th ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Catit Recipes Oak Valley
Catit has slightly fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned pork deboned beef beef liver pork liver deboned lamb deboned wild boar pork meal pea protein peas pork fat
Orijen TundraKibble |
Catit Recipes Oak ValleyKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 38% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.11 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 47 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
12 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
18 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | No, 8th Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
