Orijen Tundra vs. Marshall Ferret Crunch
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Marshall's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Marshall has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Marshall is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 21st ingredient. Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Marshall's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Marshall contains controversial ingredients.
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Marshall Ferret Crunch
Marshall has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
Marshall is 100% pea-free; Orijen has peas as its 21st ingredient.
First 10 ingredients:
chicken by-products chicken chicken by-product meal corn meal dried beet pulp brewers dried yeast dl-methionine l-lysine sodium propionate and mixed tocopherols taurine
Orijen TundraKibble |
Marshall Ferret CrunchKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
C |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 38% |
| Fat % | 20% | 18% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 3.5% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.11 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 12 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
3 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
2 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | Yes |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | No |
|
We only link to quality products. |
