Orijen Tundra vs. Purizon Chicken and Fish
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Purizon's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Purizon has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 10th ingredient).
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. However, Purizon's ratio is not bad. (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Orijen has a slightly lower concentration of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches.
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 10th ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Purizon Chicken and Fish
Purizon has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
boneless chicken meat dried chicken meat potatoes chicken fat dried egg boneless herring dried herring fish oil hydrolysed animal proteins pea fibre
Orijen TundraKibble |
Purizon Chicken and FishKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | 70% |
| Protein % | 40% | 44% |
| Fat % | 20% | 20% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 1.8% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 2.2 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 26 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
6 total
high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
10 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | No, 10th Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
