Orijen Tundra vs. Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Chicken and Turkey
If you have cats, please check out CatFoodChart.com
Create an account to hide ads!
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 3.33 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.) Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing. Both foods are mostly free of fruits, veggies, grains, and starches. Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 8th ingredient).
Orijen Tundra
Orijen has a better protein to fat ratio. Rawz's ratio of 3.33 to 1 is too high (not fatty enough). (The ideal ratio is 2 to 1.)
Both foods have peas, but Orijen has a lower concentration (21st vs 8th ingredient).
First 10 ingredients:
deboned goat deboned wild boar whole arctic char deboned venison steelhead trout deboned duck duck liver mutton whole pilchard mutton liver
Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Chicken and Turkey
Rawz has much fewer ingredients, which is usually a good thing.
First 10 ingredients:
dehydrated chicken dehydrated deboned chicken chicken turkey chicken liver turkey liver turkey hearts pea starch tapioca starch dried peas
Orijen TundraKibble |
Rawz Meal Free Dehydrated Chicken and TurkeyKibble |
|
|
Score
F |
Score
F |
|
| Food Type | Kibble | Kibble |
| Meat % | Unknown | Unknown |
| Protein % | 40% | 40% |
| Fat % | 20% | 12% |
| Fiber % | 3% | 4% |
| Protein to Fat Ratio | 2 to 1 | 3.33 to 1 |
| Total Ingredients | 50 | 24 |
| Meat Content |
30 total
high concentration, high quality |
9 total
high concentration, high quality |
| Non-Meats |
14 total
low concentration |
5 total
low concentration |
| Pea-free | No, 21st Ingredient | No, 8th Ingredient |
| Sugar-free | Yes | Yes |
| Controversial ingredient-free | Yes | Yes |
|
We only link to quality products. |
We only link to quality products. |
